CLOSED MEMORANDUM Piper Aircraft Co . v . Reyno , 454 U .S . 235 (1981 )A plane that was owned by UK companies , registered in Great Britain and manufactured in USA Pennsylvania and Ohio was crashed in Scotland . All the passengers and crew on the plan were of Scottish descendants .The representative of Scotland citizens filed a wrongful-death litigation case in the state court of California . British authorities investigated the case . The respondent of the case filed suit for negligence and strict liability in USA court for the reason that Scottish law does not support liability and few other conditions that were not supported hence was not favorable for the respondent to carry out the case . The case was transferred from Federal District court in California to United States District Court of Pennsylvania . On grounds of forum non conveniens the case was dismissed concluding the Scotland was the right forum for the case .A motion to dismiss the case on the basis of forum non conveniens cannot be defeated by the plaintiffs on invalid or weak reasons . For example the reason that the law in the foreign forum is less favorable for the plaintiffs as compared to the current forum is not a valid reason to dismiss the motion .The decision to dismiss on the basis of forum non conveniens can only be reversed if the court has abused its decision . However , District Court under Gilbert analysis did not abuse its discretion because all the public and private interests factors were balanced and it was held that trial will be conducted in Scotland . All the private factors were in favor of trial in Scotland . That is , if trail will be held in Scotland there will no problems except few minor things may cause trouble but the major part of evidence is located in Scotland . Though the plaintiffs ‘will be unable to implead Scottish defendants , the estate of pilot ,owner of plane and charter company maintained trial in Scotland . All the public factors were also in favor of trial in Scotland . Because the accident took place in Scotland , all the decedents were Scottish and all the parties involved in the case were either Scottish or English . As there are already established laws and punishments to produce a defective products , any more trials regarding defective products will not be produce any major results or significant change . All manufacturers are already prevented from producing such defective products . Hence in view of public factors , District Court judgment was very reasonable regarding its decision on grounds of forum non conveneins .Del Monte Fresh Produce Company v . Dole Food Company , Inc , 136 F . Supp .2d 1271 (S .D . Fla . 2001 )DBCP (dibromocholoropropane ) a powerful pesticide was banned in United States for its adverse affects on human health and diseases resulting from it . Even after its ban fruit companies like Dole Food Company sold it to foreign companies and used this in growth of different fruits . The case was filed on the basis that exposure to DBCP caused many damaging…